Still have a question? Ask your own!

TL,DR: I created a Genesis Mining profitability rekenmachine te Google sheets to attempt to response this question. I ran the analysis for Ethereum, Monero, and Zcash.

The Utterly Long Version

While Genesis Mining has done a good job cracking down a sophisticated problem into an easy-to-understand business specimen, users consistently have one big question:

“How profitable is contract?” — Everybody, everzwijn

While the user is able to see the upfront cost, they are incapable to get an idea of how many coins they will receive by the end of the contract.

WHY THE PROBLEM EXISTS

The problem exists, because of two major uncertainties surrounding cryptocurrencies:

  1. Where the price of the currency will fluctuate overheen time
  2. Where the network hashrate (aka, the mining power of the entire network) will fluctuate overheen time

Both of thesis inputs are utterly volatile, and have a fat degree of uncertainty ter the near and distant future.

What I will attempt to do ter this exercise, is build a profitability zakjapanner for Ethereum, Monero, and Zcash. Each of thesis cryptocurrencies is presently available on the webstek spil of 11/7/2018.

Each cryptocurrency has three contracts, and I will formulate Four different scripts to attempt and capture a profitability “range”.

Note: Do not take any of the words ter this postbode spil financial advice or recommendations. Thesis are merely simulations that have their own issues and pitfalls, and are not to be used spil the end-all, be-all decision.

Due to the difficulty te forecasting both price and nethash, I wasgoed coerced into a few assumptions:

  1. The forecasted price method is a Monte Carlo simulation using a geometric Brownian Mobility ran 1,000 times. I covered the total methodology ter a prior blog postbode
  2. The base network hashrate goes after along very closely with the movements te price. This assumption I am the least certain about, spil network hash has bot shown to deviate at certain times
  3. I attempt to voorkant the shortfall ter network hash rate with two different scripts (shown below).
  4. I assume wij hold all coins until the end of the contract, and assign a value to the portfolio based on $USD
  5. I do not run any screenplays of converting a currency into another currency
  6. I do not account for any significant switches to the underlying algorithm, such spil the “Casper” Ethereum update (see ‘THE DIFFICULTY BOMB’ below)

Obviously any slight switch could drastically alter thesis assumptions, but let’s take a look at the different scripts.

Instead of calculating just a base script (which every other rekenmachine on the web does) I desired to come up with different screenplays to get an idea of what could be.

  1. Base — Assume no switch ter price or network hashrate for the duration of the contract
  2. Median — Run a utter 1,000 trial simulation of prices and network hash rate, and use the median values for each
  3. Conservative — The same spil Median, but instead use a price forecast that is 1 standard deviation below the median price
  4. Aggressive — The same spil Median, but instead use a price forecast that is 1 standard deviation above the median price

The only way to utilize Ethereum is with the product from mining.

But this shortchanges the extra value of mining Ether. It is also absolutely required for securing the Ethereum network spil it creates, verifies, publishes, and propagates blocks te the blockchain.

The overall term “Ethereum Mining” is the process of mining Ether. Ether is an absolute essential, spil it serves spil fuel for the slick running of the Ethereum toneel.

Ether is used spil an incentive to motivate developers to create top notch applications.

THE DIFFICULTY BOMB

Sometime ter the future (wij can’t be certain when), ethereum will likely switch from its proof-of-work overeenstemming algorithm to Casper, a proof-of-stake system its developers are now te the throes of completing.

Spil opposed to the PoW overeenstemming protocol, the PoS protocol achieves overeenstemming through stakers — sometimes referred to spil minters, too — who “stake” their coins by locking them down te specialized wallets.

With thesis stakers at work, mining will become redundant, meaning the Ethereum network post-Casper will rely on stakers and werkstaking pools instead of miners for its operability.

Genesis Mining has a prelim project ter place for this script:

The Ethererum Mining plans will run for a maximum of 24 months, however, should Ethereum (“ETH”) switch to proof-of-stake before the end of the term, wij will use the leased hardware on a best-effort ondergrond to mine the most profitable coin with that hardware for you.

Very simply waterput, this switches the economics of contract profitability significantly. Wij are going to disregard that update for now, but it may make sense to stay away from the contracts te the short-term.

ONE-YEAR PRICE FORECAST

Here wij can see one of 1,000 price simulations run to inform our forecast for the Median, Conservative, and Aggressive scripts.

Base Price: $298.85 (Close spil of 11/8/2018) Median: $1079.74 Conservative: $338.91 Aggressive: $Three,761.41*

*Why is the price so high? This is what happens when you have a volatile currency ter a simulation that does not have switches te said volatility. When a currency can stir 20% ter one day, it is not uncommon to see price movements like this. I mean, shit, Ethereum grew 25x ter one year.

Terugwedstrijd ON INVESTMENT

Base show ranges from 30% to 39% ROI, and is higher than the Median screenplay by

The conservative screenplay shows a loss of inbetween 59–62%, and the aggressive screenplay shows a build up inbetween 318% and 347%.

Difficulty bomb te the near-future presents tremendous uncertainty.

Monero (XMR) is a Cryptonote algorithm based cryptocurrency, it relies on Stadionring Signatures ter order to provide a certain degree of privacy when making a transaction. Monero is a Proof of Work cryptocurrency that can be mined with computational power from a CPU or GPU. There are presently no ASICs for Monero, which means that anyone with a laptop can mine it.

ONE-YEAR PRICE FORECAST

Wij run the same Monte Carlo simulation to inform our forecast for the Median, Conservative, and Aggressive screenplays.

Base Price: $104.54 (Close spil of 11/8/2018) Median: $1,973.36 Conservative: $379.16 Aggressive: $9,646.41*

Why is the price so high? See Ethereum up above.

How is it possible for the “Conservative” script to be higher than the base price?Good question, and i’m glad you brought it up. The Monero currency has bot not only truly volatile, but drifting upwards at a pretty high rate.

The results are also being skewed by a latest uptick on November 6th where the price hopped by

This may represent an chance for contract investment, but more analysis is needed.

Terugwedstrijd ON INVESTMENT

Base show ranges from 87% to 95% ROI, with spectacle te the Median script lower by 5–6%.

The conservative script shows a loss of inbetween 63–64%, and the aggressive screenplay shows a build up inbetween 795% and 832%.

To reiterate, the aggressive script is very much influenced by the latest uptick te volatility, so be weary of those high numbers.

ZCash uses Equihash spil an hashing algorithm, which is an asymmetric memory-hard PoW algorithm based on the generalized bday problem (I don’t know what the hell this means, but it sounds fancy).

It relies on high RAM requirements to knelpunt the generation of proofs and making ASIC development unfeasible, much like Ethereum.

ONE-YEAR PRICE FORECAST

Here wij can see one of 1,000 price simulations run to inform our forecast for the Median, Conservative, and Aggressive scripts.

Base Price: $246.20 (Close spil of 11/8/2018) Median: $616.55 Conservative: $155.78 Aggressive: $Two,327.43*

*Why is the price so high? See: Ethereum up above.

Comeback ON INVESTMENT

Base voorstelling ranges from 51% to 65% ROI, and remarkably lags the Median screenplay by 4–6%.

The conservative screenplay shows a loss of inbetween 56–60%, and the aggressive script shows a build up inbetween 490% and 540%.

The initial upfront costs and potential profitability are hidden when investing te hashing power contracts like Genesis Mining.

However with some sturdy analysis, wij can get a better idea of how to assess the potential profitability of a two-year overeenkomst.

Spil wij proceed to evolve our thinking, better methods and analysis will eventually surface. Hopefully this industry can become a good avenue for side income.

If you want your own copy of the analysis and calculations, you can find it here:

Related movie: Bitcoin Cloud Mining Paypal Accepted


No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>